|
Post by Angel Macy on May 14, 2019 20:24:45 GMT -5
Horses will be posted once the lineup is released.
|
|
|
Post by Ætheling on May 16, 2019 11:23:22 GMT -5
Here are the horses
Horse Trainer Jockey ML Odds
1. War of Will Mark Casse Tyler Gaffalione 4-1
2. Bourbon War Mark Hennig Erad Ortiz, Jr. 12-1
3. Warrior's Charge Brad Cox Javier Castellano 12-1
4. Improbable Bob Baffert Mike Smith 5-2
5. Owendale Brad Cox Florent Geroux 10-1
6. Market King D. Wayne Lucas John Court 30-1
7. Alwaysmining Kelly Rubley Daniel Centeno 8-1
8. Signalman Kenny McPeek Brian Hernandez Jr. 30-1
9. Bodexpress Gustavo Delgado John Velazquez 20-1
10. Everfast Dale Romans Joel Rosario 50-1
11. Laughing Fox Steve Asmussen Ricardo Santana Jr. 20-1
12. Anothertwistafate Blaine Wright Jose Ortiz 6-1
13. Win Win Win Michael Trombetta Julian Pimentel 15-1
|
|
|
Post by Twinkle (My Sweet Angel) on May 16, 2019 12:02:59 GMT -5
Here's my picks:
1st- War of Will
2nd- Bourbon War
3rd- Improbable
|
|
|
Post by Twinkle (My Sweet Angel) on May 16, 2019 12:08:56 GMT -5
History (I copied this from Wikipedia)
Two years before the Kentucky Derby was run for the first time, Pimlico introduced its new stakes race for three-year-olds, the Preakness, during its first-ever spring race meet in 1873. Then Maryland governor Oden Bowie named the then mile and one-half (2.41 km) race in honor of the colt Preakness from Milton Holbrook Sanford's Preakness Stud in Preakness, Wayne Township, New Jersey, who won the Dinner Party Stakes on the day Pimlico opened (October 25, 1870). The New Jersey name was said to have come from the Native American name Pra-qua-les ("Quail Woods") for the area. After Preakness won the Dinner Party Stakes, his jockey, Billy Hayward, untied a silk bag of gold coins that hung from a wire stretched across the track from the judges' stand. This was the supposed way that the "wire" at the finish line was introduced and how the awarding of "purse" money came to be. In reality, the term "purse", meaning prize money, had been in use for well over a century.
The first Preakness, held on May 27, 1873, drew seven starters. John Chamberlain's three-year-old, Survivor, collected the $2,050 winning purse by galloping home easily by 10 lengths. This was the largest margin of victory until 2004, when Smarty Jones won by 11 1/2 lengths.
In 1890 Morris Park Racecourse in the Bronx, New York hosted the Preakness Stakes. This race was run under handicap conditions, and the age restriction was lifted. The race was won by a five-year-old horse named Montague. After 1890, there was no race run for three years. For the 15 years from 1894 through 1908, the race was held at Gravesend Race Track on Coney Island, New York. In 1909 it returned to Pimlico.
Seven editions of the Preakness Stakes have been run under handicap conditions, in which more accomplished or favored horses are assigned to carry heavier weight. It was first run under these conditions in 1890 and again in the years 1910-1915. During these years, the race was known as the Preakness Handicap.
In March 2009 Magna Entertainment Corp., which owns Pimlico, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy thus throwing open the possibility the Stakes could move again. On April 13, 2009, the Maryland Legislature approved a plan to buy the Stakes and the Pimlico course if Magna Entertainment cannot find a buyer.
Attendance at the Preakness Stakes ranks second in North America and usually surpasses the attendance of all other stakes races including the Belmont Stakes, the Breeders' Cup and the Kentucky Oaks. The attendance of the Preakness Stakes typically only trails the Kentucky Derby, for more information see American Thoroughbred Racing top Attended Events.
In February 2017, the Maryland Stadium Authority released the first phase of a study saying that Pimlico needed $250 million in renovations. As of May 2017, no one showed interest in financing the work. The Stronach Group, owner of Pimlico Race Course and Laurel Park, was only interested in moving the Preakness Stakes to Laurel Park unless someone else financed work on Pimlico.
|
|
|
Post by Twinkle (My Sweet Angel) on May 16, 2019 12:32:09 GMT -5
The 1989 Preakness Stakes was the 114th running of the Preakness Stakes thoroughbred horse race. The race took place on May 20, 1989, and was televised in the United States on the ABC television network. Approximate post time was 5:35 p.m. Eastern Time. The race was run over a fast track in a final time of 1:53-4/5. The Maryland Jockey Club reported total attendance of 98,896, this is recorded as second highest on the list of American thoroughbred racing top attended events for North America in 1989.
Jim McKay of ABC Sports labeled it "the best race that I have ever witnessed" during the 1995 Preakness telecast. The stretch duel of the race itself was featured on ABC's Wide World of Sports prelude claiming to be the "thrill of victory" for 12 years. It preceded the more memorable line "and the agony of defeat". Many people have either stated that this is the best horse race they've ever seen or they at least rank it somehow within their own personal top 5.
Mommy was 11 at the time. She's a really huge Sunday Silence & Easy Goer fan. Normally she always roots for whomever won the Kentucky Derby since she typically wants a Triple Crown, but she was split right down the middle on this one. She was on the edge of her seat during that stretch run. Up until that point in her life, she'd never seen a horse race that thrilling.
The Hancock brothers always had a rivalry. Arthur was connected to Sunday Silence & his brother Seth was connected to Easy Goer. Sunday Silence was a colt that nobody thought stood a chance. Nobody really wanted him. He wasn't considered anything special & got practically no respect. Easy Goer had a great pedigree & got all the respect.
In all 3 races it boiled down to Hancock vs Hancock, east vs west, black vs brown & blue blood vs blue collar. Mommy remembers one of the announcers saying that. I now present you one of the greatest horse races of all time:
|
|
|
Post by Athena (In Memory) on May 17, 2019 1:19:11 GMT -5
Ah, yes! Two great horses and a great race! Mom watched the race, too. (She was a lot older than 11, though -- hee hee).
There was an objection against Sunday Silence from Easy Goer's jockey in that race, and I would agree that Sunday Silence did brush against Easy Goer when the jockey started hitting him right-handed. I think that is the reason Easy Goer's head is tilted toward Sunday Silence -- his way of say, "hey, quite pushing me against the rail and give me a little more room to run." Back to the present: Mom was disappointed that Code of Honor will not be in the Preakness. He finished third in the Derby (second after the stewards finished with Maximum Security). Mom read that he is really small for a thoroughbred -- less than 1,000 pounds. Once she looked at him during the race, she could see how small he is.
Now we have to decide who to pick in the Preakness.
|
|
|
Post by Ætheling on May 18, 2019 10:55:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ætheling on May 18, 2019 11:09:56 GMT -5
My Picks:
1. War Of Will
2. Bourbon War
3. Win Win Win
|
|
Jason Hopper
Silly Sabs
Posts: 2,177
My birthday is: June 8th.
|
Post by Jason Hopper on May 18, 2019 12:55:04 GMT -5
Walks in with a huge plate of his famous french-fried guppies. Hi everycat. I am here, but
I just do not feel like betting after the KD fiasco. Here's the latest info stemming from that by the way:
Maximum Security's owner issues $20 million challenge to 4 Kentucky Derby rivals
Gary West just can’t get over what happened to Maximum Security in the Kentucky Derby. The horse’s owner began by appealing Maximum Security’s disqualification, then he sued in federal court to have the win restored, and now he’s doing something even crazier.
In a statement released on Friday, West issued a $20 million challenge to four Kentucky Derby rivals: if Country House, War of Will, Long Range Toddy, or Bodexpress can beat Maximum Security in any race before January 1, 2020, he’ll pay the owner of that horse $5 million of his own money. There’s a catch, though. If one of the other owners takes West up on his challenge, they’ll have to wager $5 million of their own money to pay West if Maximum Security beats their horse.
The horses don’t have to all run in the same race to take on this challenge. It could be any race between now and January 1 — West didn’t set any specifications for the length of race or the type of surface. And the other horses wouldn’t even have to win the race, they would just have to beat Maximum Security. Maximum Security's owner believes his horse is the best in the country, and has issued a $20 million challenge to four Kentucky Derby rivals to beat Maximum Security in any race. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez) Maximum Security's owner believes his horse is the best in the country, and has issued a $20 million challenge to four Kentucky Derby rivals to beat Maximum Security in any race. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)
In the statement West released about the challenge, he said that this contest has nothing to do with the Kentucky Derby disqualification of Maximum Security, but is instead about his belief in his horse’s athletic ability. Via the Louisville Courier Journal:
“Most experts agree that Maximum Security was the best horse in the Kentucky Derby. I don’t care to discuss the controversy surrounding the events of the race and the disqualification of my horse at this time, but I firmly believe I have the best 3-year-old in the country and I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is.”
It’s a little hard to believe that this $20 million Kentucky Derby rematch challenge has nothing to do with Maximum Security’s disqualification. But West also said that he hopes the challenge will lead to more interest in horse racing — presumably beyond the interest that’s come from West refusing to let go of Maximum Security’s DQ.
The statement also teased the possibility of a race between the five horses, saying it would “potentially create the most lucrative race in the world.” With all the hubbub surrounding Maximum Security’s disqualification and all the bets that would surely be placed on the race, West is probably right about that.
|
|
|
Post by Athena (In Memory) on May 18, 2019 13:03:08 GMT -5
Get otta here!!!! OK, now we need to check Mr. West's bloodlines. Could he be related to Seabiscuit's owner?
|
|
|
Post by Ætheling on May 18, 2019 13:05:08 GMT -5
** rubs his head ** oh, my!
Thanks for the delicious guppies!
|
|
|
Post by Athena (In Memory) on May 18, 2019 13:05:46 GMT -5
Here are my picks for the Preakness:
1. Improbable 2. War of Will 3. Anothertwistofate
*heads for the fried guppies*
|
|
|
Post by Twinkle (My Sweet Angel) on May 18, 2019 17:42:40 GMT -5
I think Mr. West is taking this whole thing WAY too far. I think this is insane. He's making a mockery of racing in my humble opinion. WTF???
|
|
|
Post by Ætheling on May 18, 2019 18:10:30 GMT -5
**Makes a fresh batch of Black/eyed Susan cocktails and passes them around**
If a horse were to finish in the money, but having crossed the finish line without a jockey on his back, does he lose?
|
|
|
Post by Athena (In Memory) on May 18, 2019 18:56:34 GMT -5
Order of Finish:
War of Will Everfast Owendale Warrior's Charge Laughing Fox Improbable Win Win Win Bourbon War Signalman Anothertwistafate Alwaysmining Market King Bodexpress is listed as did not finish because of losing his jockey. Even if he finished first it would not count, not only because he is riderless but don't forget he isn't carrying the weight of the jockey.
|
|